|
KW Recovery Team members wear many hats
|
By JERRY NUNN
The Kirtland’s Warbler recovery team, like the habitat it seeks to
manage, could itself be a study in diversity. Drawing on the
skills and knowledge of many, the team is made up of people from
several federal and state agencies.
While all these organizations devote many hours of time and many
shared resources to the study and management of the warbler, to
all the people involved, the songbird is but a tiny piece of their
daily jobs.
One of those people is Phil Huber; the U. S. Forest Service
authority on the Kirtland’s Warbler and a member of the warbler
recovery team since 1991.
While the bird can keep him busy, it is only a small part of many
jobs he conducts at the Mio Ranger’s office. Huber also works as
his district’s assistant ranger and forestry manager, along with
doing wildlife biology, environmental analysis and assessment.
One of Huber’s favorite jobs gives him the opportunity to travel –
each summer since 1985 he has spent time out west, fighting forest
fires.
“Nearly everyone involved with this organization is expected to
help with fire-fighting in one way or the other. There’s a lot of
activity,” said Huber, who last year worked as a dispatcher in
Missoula, Montana. “I was dispatching smoke jumpers to fires,
engines crews and retardant aircraft to different fires, it’s very
exciting. You’ll have a lightening storm go through in the
afternoon and there may be as many as 50 fires from that one
storm.”
Misguided but well meaning environmental practices of the past
cause problems today in the west, which experiences a phenomenon
known as dry lightening, severe electrical storms that contain no
rain. The combination can be devastating, according to Huber.
“That country out there is born to burn,” said Huber. “We’ve been
suppressing fire for a long time. There are many dead fuels. Now
the Forest Service is beginning to look in the opposite direction,
to start doing more burning in the landscape so that we don’t have
these explosive fires.”
The uninformed environmental approach was not limited to the west,
however. According to Huber, it is no different here and even
though the results are not the same, today they are trying to
reverse the effects of these early efforts.
“From what we know, this country is more forested now than it’s
ever been. When this area was first settled in the 1860’s, we
think it was fairly open,” said Huber. “The pine ecosystems were a
mix of standing timber and large openings and a whole host of
species would have used those openings.”
“In the 1930’s, when the Civilian Conversation Corps. worked in
this area, they were attempting to reforest the state after
logging of the late 1800’s and very early 1900’s. They did a
little too good of a job and planted over areas that were native
prairie and grassland openings,” said Huber.
Much of the habitat management performed by the forest service is
not directed at the warbler, even though the bird often finds a
direct benefit. Much warbler habitat is created as a means of fire
prevention. Habitat management for other species such as grouse,
deer and other species also have far reaching benefits and the
also focus of environmental control.
A current move within the Forest Service is to return the area to
its original habitat of old growth forests and open prairie, the
way it was before the logging industry changed the environmental
make-up of the state.
That takes teamwork, Huber said.
Before an area is managed, it undergoes an intense environmental
assessment. Experts from a variety of fields such as botanists,
biologists, entomologists and foresters perform a broad analysis
before any work is begun. As a way of sharing resources, agency
employees often cover several districts, with some, such as Huber
and the warbler, specializing in a certain species or holding
another area of expertise. |
|
|